| Part III: SOCIAL, ECONOMICAL AND POLITICAL FACTORS
Overview
Increasingly, research points to a correlation between socio-economic
disadvantage and involvement in the criminal justice system. A larger
proportion of the Aboriginal population in Canada suffers from socio-economic
imbalances in comparison to non-Aboriginal Canadians, as demographic and
socio-economic data illustrate. Justice programs may not be able to solve
the problems generated by underlying social conditions, but judicial programming
must take into account the social context in which it functions.
Poverty and Social Assistance
The Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples states that
Aboriginal people are among the poorest in Canadaxl. Approximately
half of all Aboriginal children, whether on or off-reserve, live in povertyxli.
According to a 1991 census data on household incomes, more than 60% of
Aboriginal households in Winnipeg, Regina, and Saskatoon were below the
poverty linexlii. About 80 to 90% of female single-parent households
in these cities were below the poverty line. Poverty among Aboriginal
people is primarily attributable to unemployment, but it is also linked
to low paying or part-time work, and continued participation in a hunting
and trapping lifestylexliii.
In 1990, approximately 28.6% of all Aboriginal people over 15 years
of age depended on social assistance for at least part of the year, compared
to 8.1% of the general Canadian population. The Royal Commission concluded
that unemployment and reliance on social assistance is very high and likely
to get higherxliv. Many Aboriginal people told the Royal Commission
that they despise their reliance on social assistance and wish to be more
productive.
Aboriginal people cite certain barriers that prevent them from making
the transition from dependency to self-sufficiency:
- the absence of on-reserve employment;
- an inadequate land and resource base to promote economic development
;
- a lack of educational and job skills, and
- discrimination in the labour marketxlv.
Several viable solutions directed at alleviating poverty and
economic dependency among Aboriginal peoples were proposed by the Royal
Commission. The recommendations included recognizing past treaties and
establishing new ones designed to provide a sufficient land and resource
base to promote economic development, extending Aboriginal jurisdiction
over economic development, and improving education and job skills training.
Education
A significant barrier contributing to the inability of Aboriginal
people to escape poverty stems from their lack of a formal education. Many
Aboriginal children are confronted with unemployment and are caught up
in the welfare cycle right from birthlxvi. In addition, many consider
the pursuit of an education to be futile as they believe their job prospects
to be extremely limitedxlvii.
The experiences of Aboriginal children in the residential school
system has contributed to a disenchantment with formal education opportunities.
Aboriginal children were taught in a "White" educational system, which
was better suited for White than Aboriginal children, and did not accommodate
or acknowledge the different learning and teaching styles of Aboriginal
peoples. Most First Nations children have parents who encountered negative
experiences in the formal school system and it is obvious why these parents
are reluctant to exert pressure on their children to travel to pursue post--secondary
educationxlviii. Furthermore, since the majority of Aboriginal parents
and grandparents received little or no higher education, it is a large
step for their children to see any value in pursuing itxlix. Those First
Nations children from remote communities who do wish to attend high school
must often go off-reserve, leaving behind their families and support network.
Thereafter, it is difficult for some to return home and bridge their two
worlds.
Statistics provide some idea of changing educational levels among
First Nations peoples. The percentage of school-age children on-reserve
enrolled in kindergarten, elementary and secondary schools has increased
from 72% in 1960/61 to nearly 97% in 1992/93. This enrolment increase is
due in large part to the decrease in the number of student dropouts. The
percentage of First Nations children who remain in school until grade XII
has also increased from about 3% in 1960-61, to more than half in 1992/93.
Compared to the 17% of non-Aboriginal Canadians who did not
attend high school, the statistics on Aboriginal people in 1986l were
as follows (percentage of the population 15 years and over):
| Status Indians (on-reserve) |
45 % |
| Status Indians (off-reserve) |
24 % |
| Inuit |
53 % |
| Métis |
35 % |
The number of registered Aboriginal individuals enrolled in university
increased from 60 in 1960/61 to 5,800 in 1985/86. Between 1985/86 and 1992/93,
this population increased nearly four times to 21,566 students. However,
while the rate of students attending post-secondary education continues
to rise, the participation rate of registered Aboriginal student aged 17
to 34 remain below the non-Aboriginal average for the same age groupli.
The number of band-operated schools has also increased from 53
in 1975/6 to 353 in 1992/93. The proportion of children enrolled in band-operated
elementary secondary schools is increasing (from 4% in 1975/6 to 49% in
1992/93), while the proportion enrolled in federal and other schools is
declining (a drop from 41 % in 1975/6 to 5% in 1992/93). (It is noted that
many of the band schools are now providing indigenous language classes).
Not only do barriers to education make it difficult for individuals
to escape the "welfare cycle", they also impede economic development in
Aboriginal communities. Many do not have the knowledge base or expertise
to develop effective strategic plans for the economic development of Aboriginal
communitieslii.
Unemployment
A high proportion of Aboriginal people are presently absent from
the labour force. In 1986, approximately 57% of on-reserve First Nations
and 46% of registered off-reserve First Nations people were not in the
labour force, compared to roughly 12% for Canada generally. These differences
may be related to lower education and literacy levels among Aboriginal
populations. However, the low level of reported employment may be due in
part to many Aboriginal people and others not identifying traditional Aboriginal
activities, such as hunting, trapping and fishing, as work. Thus, potentially
large numbers of Aboriginal people may have been omitted from the occupational
categories in the census collections. Fishing, trapping, forestry and other
related primary occupations are twice as common among Aboriginal communities
compared to the rest of the Canadian population.
Lack of Capital
The economic development of Aboriginal communities has been restricted
by their difficulty in raising the capital required to establish business
venturesliii, and Indian Act restrictions with respect to bank loans
and securities. On an individual basis, prejudice and discrimination
prevent many Aboriginal people from obtaining the financial resources necessary
to support a new businessliv.
Federal government policy related to Aboriginal capital is questionable.
Although the federal government holds Aboriginal capital for both welfare
and development initiatives, accumulated finances enter what is known as
the "trust fund" and are invested in government bonds. This money, which
is kept out of Aboriginal control, is reputed to be valued at well over
$100 million annually, and is held while many First Nations business ventures
do not receive the necessary financial supportlv. Aboriginal groups
or individuals requesting money from the Department of Indian Affairs and
Northern Development are regularly turned down. Each request must go through
a series of bureaucratic procedures and be approved by the federal government,
generally taking between one and five years for a grant to be accepted
or rejectedlvi.
Insufficient Business Infrastructure
Numerous detrimental consequences result from inadequate access
to business capital for Aboriginal communities. First Nations communities
have been unable to develop the business infrastructure required to accommodate
the purchasing needs of their populations. Therefore, when a band does
manage to increase its per capita income, the money is not re-invested
in the reserve or the bandlvii. Residents of reserves with money
to spend often do so outside the community, since there are so few businesses
owned and operated by Aboriginal interestslviii. Even when money
is spent on-reserve, the community may still not benefit. Of the few on-reserve
businesses, many are owned by outside groupslix.
In addition to the problems associated with inadequate access
to financial provisions, the development of business infrastructure is
also impaired by the quality of the land on reserves. With the exception
of a small number of resource abundant reserves, most are rural and have
a limited primary production capacitylx. The majority barely provide
any potential for agriculture, forestry, and trappinglxi. Less
than 10 percent of all arable Aboriginal land of fair to good quality is
under cultivation and, under current conditions, well over 300 additional
farms could be operating. Although First Nations lands contain over 11,000
square kilometres of forests and commercial yield potential, only a small
amount is presently being harvestedlxii. Thus, a large proportion of
the Aboriginal communities' limited existing potential for agricultural
and forestry development is not utilized.
Land Claims
Despite historical evidence of unfair practices in obtaining
land from Aboriginal people, Canadian governments have been reluctant to
resolve land claims disputes. Legal and political barriers have prevented
Aboriginal bands from proceeding with many land claims, discouraging economic
development within their communities. Because of the structure of the governing
bureaucracy and legislation, these claims were either suppressed or simply
not defined as bona fide claimslxiii. In fact, until the passage
of the Indian Act in 1951, Aboriginal communities required the federal
government's approval before they could launch proceedings against the
governmentlxiv. In addition, the government prohibited the use
of "Indian money" to support a lawyer to pursue a claimlxv.
Land claims are further hampered by the fact that the federal
government refuses to discuss any claims they feel are inadequately researchedlxvi.
The cost of carrying out such research and any subsequent extended legal
battle with the federal government can cripple a band financially. Although
the federal government is responsible for providing Aboriginal bands with
access to legal services in a claims dispute, these communities are responsible
for making payments (including interest) on loans from the Crown, which
ironically, are incurred to pursue these claims in the first placelxvii.
The federal government, given its comparatively unlimited access to financial
resources, can "drag on" the claims process through appeals, thus reducing
the potential for Aboriginal success in a land claim dispute.
Today, many comprehensive claims, and even larger specific claims,
have been resolved through negotiation in order to minimize potential losses
through the courtslxviii. In view of the negotiation mechanism, many
Aboriginal leaders still regard the process as biased in favour of the
federal government. As a result of the disparity in the bargaining power
of the two sides, negotiations shift toward compromises by First Nations
bands.
Housing and Living Conditions
An important indicator of the quality of living conditions is
the proportion of a population living in crowded dwellings. The size of
the average Aboriginal family tends to be larger than that of an average
non-Aboriginal family. Accommodations on-reserve are 16 times more likely
than other Canadian homes to have more than one person per room. Off-reserve
Aboriginal dwellings are 6 times more likely than other Canadian dwellings
to be crowdedlxix.
In addition to inadequate housing, poor living conditions create
additional problems. Testimony and briefs submitted to the Royal Commission
gave evidence that living conditions, with respect to water, sanitation
and housing conditions in many Aboriginal communities, is comparable to
developing countrieslxx. Sydney J. McKay of the Manitoba Métis
Federation told the Royal Commission that "the only facilities that seem
to have the running water in northern communities are the stores, [and)
of course the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, fire halls, nursing stations,
and teachers residenceslxxi.
Poor living conditions, lack of clean water and safe waste disposal
can lead to higher rates of sickness and possibly death. The Royal Commission
Report states that poor housing has been linked to infectious diseases,
and non-infectious respiratory diseases such as asthma. Over-crowding is
a crucial factor in the spread of infectious diseaseslxxii. The Royal
Commission Report also notes that water, sanitation and housing conditions
affect mental and spiritual health. Over-crowding contributes to mental
illness, especially where domestic violence is concernedlxxiii.
Alcohol Abuse
Of all addictive substances, alcohol poses the greatest threat
to Aboriginal people and their communities. According to the Canadian Centre
of Substance Abuse (CCSA), one in five people admitted to hospitals for
alcohol-related illnesses are Aboriginal. The CCSA also reports that alcohol
psychosis found in Aboriginal communities is four times the national average.
Alcohol abuse is associated with unemployment, family violence,
criminal behaviour, suicides, accidents and the general inability to succeedlxxiv.
Alcohol abuse is considered one of the single largest contributors to the
disproportionate levels of First Nations offenders within the criminal
justice system. A recent report on conditions in four northern Ontario
Aboriginal communities found that approximately 80 percent of a criminal
offences involved alcohol or solvent abuse on the part of the accusedlxxv.
Aboriginal addiction has been described as: "part of a circle
of oppression, despair, violence and self--destructive behaviour that must
be addressed as a whole."lxxvi According to the Royal Commission,
the most successful alcohol treatment programs are those that follow a
model of holistic treatment, taking all of these factors into consideration
when treating alcohol abuse, including loss of self-esteem and cultural
identitylxxvii.
Solvent Abuse
Solvent abuse also poses a threat to Aboriginal communities,
particularly Aboriginal youth and children. In the First Nations and Inuit
Community Solvent Abuse Survey and Study, almost half (48.81%) of the Aboriginal
communities that responded recognized solvent abuse as a problem affecting
the entire communitylxxviii. Solvent abuse is more common in northern and
remote communities where social and economic structures may not be as stronglxxix, The Study also discovered respondents began using solvents at a very young
age with half abusing them between the ages of 4 and 11. Unfortunately,
the age of first use is becoming youngerlxxx.
Aboriginal peoples identified these conditions as contributing
to solvent abuselxxxi:
- loss or absence of cultural identity;
- absence of family and/or community support;
- lack of awareness of the effects of solvent abuse;
- lack of spiritual guidance, and
-
presence of other forms of abuse, such as sexual, physical, verbal
or mental.
Solvents are attractive to adolescents for a variety of reasons.
They are legal, inexpensive, often more accessible than drugs or alcohol,
and have almost immediate effects (rapid mood elevation can occur within
15-45 seconds). Solvent users can also display a variety of other symptoms
such as bluffed vision, nausea, and slurred speech with chronic abuse potentially
resulting in brain damage, paranoid psychosis, and heart failure.
Domestic Breakdown
The percentage of single parent families among Aboriginal people
is about twice the overall Canadian figure. Approximately five times
more single-parent families are headed by women than menlxxxii.
Aboriginal single parent families
| off-reserve |
(30% of all families) |
| on-reserve |
(24% of all families) |
Domestic Violence
Domestic violence can include physical violence, sexual, psychological,
and economic abuse (where women and the elderly are dominated by another
family member who controls their finances). A Statistics Canada (1993)
survey found that 5 1 % of Canadian women have been physically or sexually
abused at least once by the age of 16, and 25% of married women have been
physically or sexually abused by their spouseslxxxiii. In contrast,
a study conducted by the Ontario Native Women's Association reported that
80% of Aboriginal women were victims of violence. Of this total, 87% had
been abused physically and 57% had been sexually abusedlxxxiv. In addition,
death caused by a violent act occurs three times more frequently within
Aboriginal than non-Aboriginal communities with this rate even higher among
the Inuitlxxxv.
Sharon Caudron, Program Director for the Women's Resource Centre
of Hay River in the Northwest Territories, described the price that children
pay when domestic violence occurs - "The cost to our children is hidden
in their inability to be attentive in school, in feelings of insecurity
and low-esteem and in acting out behaviour which may manifest itself in
many ways, such as vandalism, self-abuse, bullying; and often the children
suffer in silence."lxxxvi
The Royal Commission pointed out ways that Aboriginal domestic
violence is distinct from non- Aboriginal:
- Aboriginal domestic violence does not rest within the boundaries
of the family unit but permeates the whole community;
- dysfunctional family relations can be traced back to deliberate intervention
on the part of the Crown to disrupt the First Nations family, and
- devaluing of Aboriginal traditions and language destroys cultural
pride and identity and sets the stage for violence within Aboriginal communitieslxxxvii.
Suicide
Suicide is a significant concern in many Aboriginal communities,
is two to three times more common among Aboriginal peoples and is also
five to six times more prevalent among Aboriginal youth than non-Aboriginal
youthlxxxviii.
According to Aboriginal tradition, suicide was rare in Pre-colonialism
times because it was viewed as unacceptable. Those who did commit suicide
were generally the sick or elderly who felt they could no longer contribute
to their community and their deaths were perceived as acts of self-sacrifice.
In First Nations communities today, suicide is more common among the young
and usually results from feelings of hopelessness and despairlxxxix.
The following factors are often linked to suicidexc:
- continuous family disruptions and instability
- family history of mental health problems
- alcohol and/or drug abuse
- physical and/or sexual abuse, and
- extended periods of grief
Self-government
Self-government initiatives reflect an attempt on the part of
Aboriginal communities to regain the power to determine their own futures.
Autonomy objectives vary among First Nations communities, requiring Canadian
governments to provide a flexible framework to accommodate responses to
diverse Aboriginal demands and interests. Self-government entails empowering
Aboriginal peoples with control over their culture, language, heritage
and recognizing them as distinct peoples. The federal government supports
"community self-government," which provides band councils with more autonomy.
The provincial and federal governments must make negotiating self-government
and land claims with Aboriginal groups a priority.
It has become increasingly clear to Aboriginal people that the
Canadian criminal justice system is not addressing their needs at a satisfactory
pace, including their demands for more control and authority in resolving
criminal disputes within their communities. Self-government would return
control of Aboriginal communities back to Aboriginal authorities to decide
upon appropriate judicial decisions. The fight to self-government includes
the right to a separate Aboriginal justice system based upon Aboriginal
values, philosophies, customs, and traditions. The issues of crime, punishment,
and judicial policy, invariably debated in non--Aboriginal communities,
needs to be examined in Aboriginal communities, as they decide for themselves
what is best for their community and those harmed by crime. An independent
Aboriginal justice system should incorporate the values, philosophies,
activities and practices of Aboriginal communities and ensure the delivery
of culturally relevant programs and services including certain justice,
law enforcement and correctional programs.
Summary
The social and economic conditions outlined in this section attempt
to illustrate a correlation between these factors and Aboriginal criminal
conduct. Poverty, inadequate educational opportunities, unemployment,
poor living conditions, alcohol abuse and domestic violence, among other
factors, all contribute to constrain cultural identity and promote feelings
of hopelessness and despair. It is clear that the Canadian criminal justice
system presently is not meeting the needs of Aboriginal peoples. It is
acknowledged that simply establishing First Nations self government will
not fully resolve all Aboriginal judicial problems but this change in policy
should be regarded as a very positive step.
|